From particular standing to namaaz ban, ally BJP is taking part in opposition to Nitish’s Bihar govt


Patna: Bihar Chief Minister and JD(U) chief Nitish Kumar is dealing with extra opposition from ally BJP as of late than he’s from rival events just like the RJD. Nitish didn’t attempt to disguise his fury final Monday when he realized that Renu Devi, certainly one of his two BJP deputy CMs, had undermined his demand for particular standing for Bihar.

“Deputy CM ko kuch bhi pata nahin (she is aware of nothing),” Nitish stated after his weekly Janata Darbar (folks’s courtroom). The subsequent day, nonetheless, one other BJP minister, Jivesh Kumar, informed ThePrint on file that there was no want for particular standing.

The controversy began with a report final month by NITI Aayog, the central authorities’s public coverage think-tank, that ranked Bihar because the poorest state in India. In response, the Nitish authorities wrote to the NITI Aayog pitching for particular standing for Bihar in order that it might treatment its “backward” standing on parameters like human growth, per capita earnings, and ease of residing. Deputy CM Renu Devi, nonetheless, stated the demand for particular standing was “pointless” for the reason that central authorities was already funneling extra funds into Bihar than it could have if the state had particular standing.

Whereas the BJP and JD(U) have been sparring on different issues too — together with on parliamentary proceedings and a proposed ban on public namaaz — occasion spokespersons are attempting to downplay variations. BJP spokesperson Prem Ranjan Patel informed ThePrint that “hiccups occur in each alliance” whereas JD(U) MLC Neeraj Kumar stated “these episodes won’t have an effect on the federal government”.

Additionally Learn: As Nitish govt recirculates 70-year-old temple tax provision, BJP questions why solely temples

The particular standing row

Nitish’s heated response to Renu Devi’s assertion was captured by the federal government press, however later that night, the CM spoke extra circumspectly in regards to the challenge to journalists in a non-public gathering. Nitish stated Bihar’s place as one of the vital backward states within the NITI Aayog report gave credence to the demand for particular standing.

“In 2005 after I got here to energy, the typical earnings of an individual in Bihar was simply Rs 7,000. Now it’s above Rs 43,000, however nonetheless method behind the nationwide common,” Nitish stated remarked.

BJP leaders, nonetheless, are nonetheless not satisfied. State labour minister Jivesh Mishra informed ThePrint Tuesday that Bihar “doesn’t meet the standards” for particular standing. “We’re doing properly with out it. The Centre has been pumping in extra money,” Mishra stated.

The problem of particular standing has been raised by Nitish Kumar on and off since 2009. When Nitish held rallies and petitioned the Manmohan Singh authorities in regards to the matter, BJP leaders gave him verbal help, however are actually overtly rejecting his name for particular standing.

Political observers imagine that the help got here at a time when Nitish was the large brother of the alliance, however he’s presently a “junior companion”, with 43 seats within the state meeting in comparison with the BJP’s 74.

Namaaz ban

Final week, BJP MLA Haribhushan Thakur demanded a ban on public namaaz, alongside the strains of the brand new guidelines in Haryana. He was backed by BJP minister Samrat Choudhary. “Faith is a private challenge. It shouldn’t be allowed to stream on the roads and public locations,” Choudhary stated to ThePrint.

JD(U) leaders have dominated out any such ban, however are smarting in regards to the challenge. “The actual fact stays that the BJP has raised the problem unconcerned in regards to the influence it may need on us,” a JD(U) MLA stated on the situation of anonymity.

Speaker controversies

Bihar Speaker Vijay Kumar Sinha, who belongs to the BJP, began a brand new conference within the not too long ago concluded winter session: He had the MLAs sing the nationwide anthem — a transfer that the JD(U) had not been informed about. “It’s commonplace. This occurs in Madhya Pradesh,” Sinha informed ThePrint.

The Speaker broke one other conference when he introduced {that a} Home committee would probe a public challenge, a primary throughout Nitish’s regime. On a query associated to corruption by an engineer within the Rural Growth Division — which is headed by a JD(U) minister— the Speaker introduced the formation of a Home committee to probe the matter. Making issues worse was that the Speaker appointed former minister Nitish Mishra — a identified baiter of the CM and a BJP MLA — as the pinnacle of the panel.

Sparring within the Lok Sabha

The variations between the JD(U) and BJP surfaced within the Lok Sabha too this week. Throughout query hour Tuesday, BJP MP Ram Kripal Yadav criticised the Bihar authorities for lagging behind in finishing street tasks below the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY). Union Minister for Rural Growth Giriraj Singh additionally quoted statistics to again Yadav’s claims.

Unsurprisingly, JD(U) leaders have been left fuming. Lalan Singh, the JD(U)’s nationwide president, reminded Giriraj that the NDA had a authorities in Bihar and the Centre, and that Giriraj additionally hails from Bihar. He accused Giriraj of failing to carry a gathering with state officers to take away the bottleneck. Giriraj retorted that he had held a number of rounds of conferences with each officers and politicians, and that Lalan was free to speak to him in regards to the matter.

Governor’s brush-off

Final month, Nitish Kumar had raised a requirement to dismiss controversial college vice-chancellors appointed by Bihar Governor Phagu Chauhan. The problem got here to the forefront when a vigilance raid performed within the workplace of the V-C of Magadh College revealed large quantities of unaccounted money.

Though Nitish met Chauhan on 24 November to debate the dismissal of controversial V-Cs, the governor has not acted on the demand up to now, resulting in hypothesis that the Centre has not backed Nitish.

What’s inflicting the rift?

The Nitish Kumar-BJP alliance has seen fraught moments previously, however the present state of affairs is unprecedented, with BJP leaders and even ministers publicly denouncing the insurance policies of a authorities of which they’re a component.

One purpose for this, in accordance with many political observers within the state, is that there are not seasoned BJP leaders like Sushil Kumar Modi and Nand Kishor Yadav to modulate the pronouncements of occasion members.

Secondly, Nitish Kumar’s personal picture in governance has taken a plunge and the BJP doesn’t need to be seen as ‘too shut’ to him. The NDA alliance barely managed to win within the 2020 meeting polls and the BJP is questioning whether or not Nitish would possibly flip into baggage somewhat than an asset for them.

Nevertheless, BJP spokesperson Prem Ranjan Patel reiterated that the current pressure is momentary. “The primary factor is that each events know that they’re collectively for the good thing about Bihar,” he stated.

JD(U) spokesperson Neeraj Kumar additionally denied that the rift was critical. “The alliance authorities capabilities on the idea of the seven resolves made by Nitish Kumar throughout polls. There isn’t any distinction there,” he stated.

(Edited by Asavari Singh)

Additionally Learn: Give justice to minister, cries Opposition in Bihar as forms ‘insults’ ruling BJP MLA



Supply hyperlink